WoodComp

Sawmill Byproducts and the Chip Flow

Roughly half of every log entering a sawmill leaves as something other than a board, and for small diameter logs the share is higher still; the yield figures behind that are on the sawmilling page. Those streams are not waste and have not been for decades: sawmill chips are a primary raw material for pulp and board mills, sawdust feeds the pellet industry, and bark fuels the kiln that dries the timber. This page explains where each stream goes, and why WoodComp never adds sawmill wood consumption to pulp mill wood consumption.

The streams at a glance

StreamWhere it comes fromMain destinationTraded
ChipsOuter slabs, edgings, trim endsPulp mills, particleboard, fibreboardWidely
SawdustThe saw cut itselfPellets, particleboard, energyWidely
ShavingsPlaningPellets, animal bedding, particleboardWidely
BarkDebarkingMill boiler, district heating, landscapingLocally
Offcuts and downgradesTrimming and gradingPallets, packaging, fuelLocally

Chips are a product, not a residue

The most important thing to understand about sawmill chips is that they are specified, graded and sold like any other raw material. Pulp mills buy them by species, size distribution and cleanliness, and a chip that carries bark or grit is worth less because it damages pulp quality. Fuel chip quality is specified in the ISO 17225 series; pulpwood chips are traded under separate commercial specifications.

Two consequences follow.

First, the sawmill sits upstream of the pulp mill, not parallel to it. In regions with a large sawmilling sector, a pulp mill may take a substantial share of its fibre as purchased chips rather than as roundwood. Where that is the case, its wood supply becomes partly dependent on sawn timber demand, which is driven by construction rather than by pulp markets. When housing starts fall, sawmills cut shifts, chip supply tightens, and chip dependent mills must buy more roundwood at exactly the moment their own fibre cost rises. Fibre is the largest single cost item in pulp production, so the effect is material. This dependence is a regional characteristic, not a universal one: mills that run predominantly on roundwood or on recovered fibre are not exposed to it in the same way.

Second, chips are bulky to move. Loose chips are considerably less dense than stacked roundwood, so a chip trailer carries less wood per unit of load volume than a timber truck. Whether a chip load runs out of space or out of weight before it is full depends on moisture and equipment: fresh sawmill chips are wet and heavy enough that loads often reach the legal weight limit, while dry fuel chips typically fill the volume first. Either way, the haulage cost per tonne of fibre is higher for chips than for roundwood over the same distance, which is why chip flows by road tend to stay regional. It is not an absolute limit: large volumes of chips also cross oceans by ship, notably to pulp mills in East Asia.

Sawdust, shavings and bark

Sawdust volume is a direct function of blade thickness and the number of cuts. The saw removes wood as short particles rather than intact fibre bundles, so sawdust yields a short-fibred pulp with little reinforcing strength. Dedicated sawdust kraft lines were built from the 1960s onward, mainly in western Canada, and sawdust pulp was sold as a distinct grade, but the economics never matched chip-based lines and nearly all of that capacity has closed.

Shavings come from planing and are clean, dry and low density.

Bark is the lowest value stream, and in practice it is what dries the timber: a sawmill's kilns typically run on its own bark and sawdust. Where a district heating network is available, surplus heat is often sold into it, which turns a residue into a second revenue line. The same logic appears at pulp mills, see pulping byproducts.

Why we never add sawmill and pulp mill consumption together

The question arises because the sawmill sits upstream of the pulp mill: a large share of the chips a pulp mill consumes began as sawlogs at a sawmill, so the same wood shows up in the intake of both. WoodComp therefore reports consumption separated by assortment, with roundwood, chips and recovered wood in distinct columns, and never sums those columns into a single figure. The rule in full, with a worked example, is on the methodology page.

Frequently asked questions

Are sawmill chips a waste product?

No. They are a specified, graded and widely traded raw material, and they are a primary fibre source for pulp and board mills.

Why would a pulp mill care about housing starts?

Because sawmills produce chips only when they are sawing. In regions where mills buy a large share of their fibre as chips, weak construction demand tightens chip supply and forces them to buy more roundwood.

Is sawdust used for pulp?

Rarely today. The saw cuts fibres short, so sawdust pulp has low tear strength and works as a filler rather than as a reinforcing fibre. Dedicated sawdust kraft lines did operate commercially, mainly in western Canada, but almost all have closed.

Why does this site not show one total wood consumption figure per country?

Because sawmills and pulp mills partly consume the same wood, once as logs and once as chips, so summing them counts that wood twice. Consumption is therefore shown separated by assortment. See methodology.

Sources7 references

Classification and conversion factors

  1. FAO, *Classification and definitions of forest products*, definitions of chips, particles and wood residues: https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics
  2. FAO/ITTO/UNECE (2020), *Forest Product Conversion Factors*, roundwood to sawnwood recovery and residue shares

Chip specifications

  1. ISO 17225 series, *Solid biofuels. Fuel specifications and classes*, including wood chips and pellets; pulpwood chips are specified separately (for example SCAN-CM 40)

Transport and bulk density

  1. Forest Research (UK), woodfuel processing: bulk density of wood chips, https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/fthr/biomass-energy-resources/fuel/woodfuel-production-and-supply/woodfuel-processing/
  2. Laitila et al. (2016), transport of forest industry by-products, *Biomass and Bioenergy*, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953416301258

Sawdust pulping history

  1. *Pulp & Paper Canada*, "Kraft pulp manufacturing in Canada: the first century", on dedicated sawdust digesters, https://www.pulpandpapercanada.com/kraft-pulp-manufacturing-in-canada-the-first-century-1000200849/

WoodComp method

  1. WoodComp methodology, assortment separation and the double counting rule, see [methodology]